Prediction of Dane Sweeny [581st] vs James McCabe [181st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W LH2H: Sweeny 5 - 2 McCabe
They have played 17 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 10 and McCabe winning 7. The last match between Sweeny and McCabe was at the Burnie 2 Challenger, 09-02-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dane Sweeny | 5 |
| James McCabe | 2 |
| Sweeny | Stats | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (13-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (12-11) |
| 5 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 581 | Ranking | 181 |
| 194 | Highest Rank | 181 |
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (178-144) | Career Total W/L | 59% (152-105) |
| $346,065 | Career Prize Money | $234,855 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 5 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Dane Sweeny
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Dane Sweeny
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
James McCabe
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
James McCabe
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Dane Sweeny
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 10 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 83 | Games Won | 76 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 44 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:28:18 | Average Match Time | 1:28:18 |
| 64% (262/407) | 1st Serve % | 57% (217/379) |
| 68% (177/262) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (153/217) |
| 54% (79/145) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (81/162) |
| 45% (15/33) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (13/39) |
| 38% (145/379) | Return Points Win % | 37% (151/407) |
| 71% (5/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 50% (4/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dane Sweeny vs James McCabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sweeny 5 - 2 McCabe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sweeny has won 44.91% of points on their second serve, while McCabe has won 44.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sweeny, in recent form, has won 46.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while McCabe has won 48.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.05% and 23.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sweeny has saved 56.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCabe has saved 54.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sweeny has won 39.53% of matches played (W/L 17/ 26), with McCabe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sweeny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 145/ 102), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). McCabe has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Sweeny has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.74% of matches (W/L 5/ 18), where as McCabe has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Sweeny winning 5 times and McCabe being victorious 2 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 10 and McCabe winning 7. The last match between Sweeny and McCabe was at the Burnie 2 Challenger, 09-02-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sweeny and McCabe have played a deciding set 3 times, with Sweeny winning 3 times and McCabe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sweeny winning 2, and McCabe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sweeny has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.79 while McCabe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sweeny has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCabe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sweeny has converted 34.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCabe has converted 31.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Dane Sweeny vs James McCabe Best Odds For The Match
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Omar Jasika
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Ethan Cook
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Dane Sweeny
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Stefan Storch
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Dane Sweeny
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
James McCabe
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
James McCabe
59%
(
78 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
7
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
5
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
53 of
74)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
32%
(
42 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
129)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(9) 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
James McCabe
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
James McCabe
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
1
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
36%
(
18 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Nicolas Mejia
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
38%
(
20 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
23
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(8) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
James McCabe
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Sweeny vs McCabe?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Sweeny Vs McCabe is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (178/144) | Win/Loss | 59% (152/105) |
| 53% (398/359) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (3661/3481) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 693 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1012 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:38:51 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 286.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 63% (13301/21207) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (8712/13301) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (4007/7906) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (930/2161) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (8441/20820) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (175/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (41/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (68/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (155/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 12% (155/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (167/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
